TGJ3M_summative_evaluation

include component="page" wikiName="jmcintyre" page="course_tabs_header" include component="page" wikiName="jmcintyre" page="menu_TGJ3M_crumbs" include component="page" wikiName="jmcintyre" page="menu_tgj3m_summative"

=Summative Evaluation=

Each group member is to submit a simple text file (notepad) into their handin folder that has the following:
 * 1) Who submitted the video and who else was in your group;
 * 2) Exact breakdown of who did what major tasks (if different from when you did the pitch);
 * 3) [[file:jmcintyre/Log Sheet 1.doc|Log Sheet 1.doc]] A logsheet with exactly who did what and over what period of time
 * 4) A list of problems along the way and how you overcame them
 * 5) A list of things you'd change if you were to do the project again with the same song.

I assume, unless you otherwise wish it, that the music itself will be lip-synched but it may be an original should you want to do so. You will be evaluated as follows: (including lyrics, group-members roles'. On the google submission) || Member roles are unique and clearly defined. Evaluation of each separate individual is easily achieved. || Member roles are largely defined. Occasional overlaps as a result of undefined, or poorly-defined tasks. Individual evaluation is still relatively easily achieved. || Member roles are not entirely clearly defined. There are many areas of overlap, and other areas not entirely allocated for individuals. Individuals may run the risk of having the project turned down. || Member roles are not clearly defined. There are many areas of overlap. Furthermore, there are more than a few key areas non-tasked. Individuals **will** have the project turned down. || (if you're not taking pictures then each member must be involved in the cinematography at one point or another) || Angles and shot choices are well thought out and enhance the content. || Angles and shot choices show a degree of skill but some may lead to distraction away from the message of the film || Camera positioning and movement tracking are not well used to enhance the film. || Camera positioning and movement tracking are distracting and appear happenstance. ||
 * NOTE: the category is colour-coded blue for each part that MUST be completed by EACH group member**
 * ===CATEGORY=== || ===Level 4=== || ===Level 3=== || ===Level 2=== || ===Level 1=== ||
 * **Pre-Production** ||  ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Pitch-sheet
 * Storyboarding || Storyboard is easy to read and all elements are so clearly written, labeled, or drawn that another student could create the presentation if necessary. || Storyboard is easy to read and most elements are clearly written, labeled, or drawn. Another person might be able to create the presentation after asking one or two questions. || Storyboard has missing elements or is hard to read with rough drawings and labels. It would be hard for another person to create this presentation without asking lots of questions. || Storyboard is missing many key elements and is hard to read. One cannot tell what goes where. It would be impossible for another person to create this presentation without asking lots of questions. ||
 * Shot List || There is a concise list of shots necessary to make the production a success and minimize time needed on location/set. || The list of shots is relatively complete. The production will likely be a success and with only marginal wait-times on location/set. || The shots list appear partially complete. There will be delays while filming on location/set. || The shots list is inadequate. Much time will be wasted on location/set trying to accommodate all of the shots needed. ||
 * **Production** ||  ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Cinematography
 * Lighting || Key lighting is used correctly to lead to a superior product. || Lighting is used correctly in most instances, yet could be enhanced in others. || An attempt was made to light the subject, but often incorrectly. || Little planned lighting is used, relying almost solely on ambient lighting by default (and not on purpose). ||
 * **Post-Production** ||  ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Editing || Clip choices and cuts are well thought out and enhance the content. The story-arc is obvious and well-crafted without pandering. || Clip choices and cuts show a degree of skill but some may lead to distraction away from the message of the film. The story arc is largely obvious and well crafted with few-to-no confusing scene choices || Clip choices and cuts leave a somewhat coherent story behind. The story arc is understandable, but confusing at times. Choices in clips not always complimentary to the story. || Clip choice and cuts distracting and appear random. The story arc is confusing, or barely present based on clip/scene choices. ||
 * Soundtrack || The music/sounds are perfectly timed to actions, there are no noticeable flaws in timing to the content of the film. || The syncing of the music/sound is largely well done, but occasionally doesn't fit actors movements. || The volume/type/placement distracts the viewer on occasion || The music is difficult to listen and/or the piece is difficult to watch for the flaws in its use/timing ||
 * **Misc.** ||  ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Use of a Flash element (bumper or otherwise) || The element is unobtrusive and accentuates the piece || The element is largely well done, but may not exactly fit || Flash element's placement is present, but distracts to some degree. || Element is awkward, or doesn't fit the piece. ||
 * Use of Time || Used time well during each class period (as shown by observation by teacher, and documentation of progress in journal) with no reminders. || Used time well during most class periods (as shown by observation by teacher, and documentation of progress in journal) with no reminders. || Used time well (as shown by observation by teacher and documentation of progress in journal), but required reminders on one or more occasions to do so. || Used time poorly (as shown by observation by teacher and/or documentation of progress in journal) in spite of several reminders to do so. ||
 * Teamwork - communications || Excellent communication with colleagues about roles, tasks or issues should they rise. No remediation necessary. || Considerable communication with colleagues about roles, tasks or issues should they rise. No significant remediation necessary. || Some communication with colleagues about roles, tasks or issues should they rise. Little remediation necessary. || Poor communication with colleagues about roles, tasks or issues should they rise. Remediation was necessary. ||
 * **Documentation** ||  ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Log-sheet || Members chronicled in some detail their work times and roles as the project was worked on. || Members chronicled, with some success, their activities || There was some attempt to record work times/roles but there are many gaps/flaws in the work || There was an attempt to record times/roles but generally the result is well-below expectations ||
 * Critical reflection || Members detailed with a great deal of success the problems they encountered while doing the project as well as the steps used to overcome the problems. There is considerable insight in detailing how they would change what they would do if the project were to be repeated || Members detailed with a some success the problems they encountered while doing the project as well as the steps used to overcome the problems. There is some insight in detailing how they would change what they would do if the project were to be repeated || Members generally detail problems they encountered while doing the project as well as the steps used to overcome the problems. There is little insight into detailing how they would change what they would do if the project were to be repeated || Members skim over problems, solutions and how they'd change things for the future. ||