TGJ2O_summative_evaluation

include component="page" page="course_tabs_header" include component="page" page="menu_tgj2o_crumbs" include component="page" wikiName="jmcintyre" page="menu_tgj2o_summative"

Evaluation:

 * ===CATEGORY=== || ===Breakdown of curriculum=== || ===Level 4=== || ===Level 3=== || ===Level 2=== || ===Level 1=== ||
 * **Pre-Production** ||
 * Concept Proposal || //K&U, T&I, Comm// || Students have proposed a clear picture of what they are trying to achieve. || Students have proposed a fairly clear picture of what they are trying to achieve. However with the occasional difficulty describing how to achieve the product || Student has proposed their concept, but no single clear focus has emerged. || Student have spent little effort on planning and refining a concept. Student is unclear on the goals and how they will reach the goal. ||
 * Story-boarding || //K&U, T&I, Comm, App.// || Storyboard is easy to read and all elements are so clearly written, labeled, or drawn that another student could create the presentation if necessary. || Storyboard is easy to read and most elements are clearly written, labeled, or drawn. Another person might be able to create the presentation after asking one or two questions. || Storyboard has missing elements or is hard to read with rough drawings and labels. It would be hard for another person to create this presentation without asking lots of questions. || Storyboard is missing many key elements and is hard to read. One cannot tell what goes where. It would be impossible for another person to create this presentation without asking lots of questions. ||
 * **Production** ||
 * Camerawork || //K&U, T&I, Comm// || Shots are clear, in focus and framed well. Camera work is exemplary || Generally camerawork is well done. Shots are generally in focus. || Framing and focus are problems at times but generally acceptable || Shots usually out of focus, framing is poorly done and resulting photography/footage is largely unusable. ||
 * **Post-Production** ||
 * Editing || //App// || Clip choices and cuts are well thought out and enhance the content. The story-arc is obvious and well-crafted without pandering. || Clip choices and cuts show a degree of skill but some may lead to distraction away from the message of the film. The story arc is largely obvious and well crafted with few-to-no confusing scene choices || Clip choices and cuts leave a somewhat coherent story behind. The story arc is understandable, but confusing at times. Choices in clips not always complimentary to the story. || Clip choice and cuts distracting and appear random. The story arc is confusing, or barely present based on clip/scene choices. ||
 * Sound || //T&I// || All sound effects / voiceovers / soundtrack fit perfectly and seamlessly in the piece. All sound work fits perfectly and enhances the piece || The occasional sound-effect or VO or soundtrack is mistimed or is too loud, but the work is largely successful. || Sound effects or VO or soundtrack largely work, though volume or timing occasionally distract the viewer. || There are many flaws in either timing or volume which lead the viewer to disengage. ||
 * Graphics || //App// || All graphics work exceeds expectation || Graphics work meets expectations and has all the elements of design discussed in class || Editing and use of graphics approaches expectations, but doesn't quite meet them || Graphics use is present, but doesn't approach expectations. ||
 * Animation || //App// || All animation work exceeds expectation || Animation work meets expectations and has all the elements of design discussed in class || Animation approaches expectations, but doesn't quite meet them || Animation use is present, but doesn't approach expectations. ||
 * **Misc.** ||
 * Use of Time || //K&U, App, Comm// || Used time well during each class period (as shown by observation by teacher, and documentation of progress in journal) with no reminders. || Used time well during most class periods (as shown by observation by teacher, and documentation of progress in journal) with no reminders. || Used time well (as shown by observation by teacher and documentation of progress in journal), but required reminders on one or more occasions to do so. || Used time poorly (as shown by observation by teacher and/or documentation of progress in journal) in spite of several reminders to do so. ||
 * Log-sheet || //K&U, App, Comm// || Members chronicled in some detail their work times and roles as the project was worked on. || Members chronicled, with some success, their activities || There was some attempt to record work times/roles but there are many gaps/flaws in the work || There was an attempt to record times/roles but generally the result is well-below expectations ||
 * Use of Time || //K&U, App, Comm// || Used time well during each class period (as shown by observation by teacher, and documentation of progress in journal) with no reminders. || Used time well during most class periods (as shown by observation by teacher, and documentation of progress in journal) with no reminders. || Used time well (as shown by observation by teacher and documentation of progress in journal), but required reminders on one or more occasions to do so. || Used time poorly (as shown by observation by teacher and/or documentation of progress in journal) in spite of several reminders to do so. ||
 * Log-sheet || //K&U, App, Comm// || Members chronicled in some detail their work times and roles as the project was worked on. || Members chronicled, with some success, their activities || There was some attempt to record work times/roles but there are many gaps/flaws in the work || There was an attempt to record times/roles but generally the result is well-below expectations ||